Effects of antidepressant on FKBP51 mRNA expression and neuroendocrine hormones in patients with panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of escitalopram on the peripheral expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-related genes (FKBP51, HSP90, NR3C1 and POMC) and HPA-axis hormones in patients with panic disorder (PD). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with PD were treated with escitalopram for 12 weeks. All participants were assessed for the severity of panic symptoms using the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS). The expression of HPA-axis genes was measured using real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR, and ACTH and cortisol levels were measured using chemiluminescence at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with PD had elevated levels of ACTH and cortisol, and FKBP51 expression in comparison to healthy controls (all p < 0.01). Correlation analysis revealed that FKBP51 expression levels were significantly positively related to cortisol levels and the severity of PD (all p < 0.01). Furthermore, baseline ACTH and cortisol levels, and FKBP51 expression levels were significantly reduced after 12 weeks of treatment, and the change in the PDSS score from baseline to post-treatment was significantly and positively related to the change in cortisol (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that PD may be associated with elevated levels of ACTH and cortisol, and FKBP51 expression, and that all three biomarkers are substantially decreased in patients who have received escitalopram treatment.

Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A panic attack is a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset and reaches a peak within 10 minutes. The main symptoms involve bodily systems, such as racing heart, chest pain, sweating, shaking, dizziness, flushing, churning stomach, faintness and breathlessness. Other recognised panic attack symptoms involve fearful cognitions, such as the fear of collapse, going mad or dying, and derealisation (the sensation that the world is unreal). Panic disorder is common in the general population with a prevalence of 1% to 4%. The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants and benzodiazepines. OBJECTIVES: To compare, via network meta-analysis, individual drugs (antidepressants and benzodiazepines) or placebo in terms of efficacy and acceptability in the acute treatment of panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. To rank individual active drugs for panic disorder (antidepressants, benzodiazepines and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To rank drug classes for panic disorder (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and benzodiazepines (BDZs) and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To explore heterogeneity and inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence in a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, CENTRAL, CDSR, MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and PsycINFO to 26 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people aged 18 years or older of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. We included trials that compared the effectiveness of antidepressants and benzodiazepines with each other or with a placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data and continuous data as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD): response to treatment (i.e. substantial improvement from baseline as defined by the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), total number of dropouts due to any reason (as a proxy measure of treatment acceptability: dichotomous outcome), remission (i.e. satisfactory end state as defined by global judgement of the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), panic symptom scales and global judgement (continuous outcome), frequency of panic attacks (as recorded, for example, by a panic diary; continuous outcome), agoraphobia (dichotomous outcome). We assessed the certainty of evidence using threshold analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, we included 70 trials in this review. Sample sizes ranged between 5 and 445 participants in each arm, and the total sample size per study ranged from 10 to 1168. Thirty-five studies included sample sizes of over 100 participants. There is evidence from 48 RCTs (N = 10,118) that most medications are more effective in the response outcome than placebo. In particular, diazepam, alprazolam, clonazepam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, clomipramine, fluoxetine and adinazolam showed the strongest effect, with diazepam, alprazolam and clonazepam ranking as the most effective. We found heterogeneity in most of the comparisons, but our threshold analyses suggest that this is unlikely to impact the findings of the network meta-analysis. Results from 64 RCTs (N = 12,310) suggest that most medications are associated with either a reduced or similar risk of dropouts to placebo. Alprazolam and diazepam were associated with a lower dropout rate compared to placebo and were ranked as the most tolerated of all the medications examined. Thirty-two RCTs (N = 8569) were included in the remission outcome. Most medications were more effective than placebo, namely desipramine, fluoxetine, clonazepam, diazepam, fluvoxamine, imipramine, venlafaxine and paroxetine, and their effects were clinically meaningful. Amongst these medications, desipramine and alprazolam were ranked highest. Thirty-five RCTs (N = 8826) are included in the continuous outcome reduction in panic scale scores. Brofaromine, clonazepam and reboxetine had the strongest reductions in panic symptoms compared to placebo, but results were based on either one trial or very small trials. Forty-one RCTs (N = 7853) are included in the frequency of panic attack outcome. Only clonazepam and alprazolam showed a strong reduction in the frequency of panic attacks compared to placebo, and were ranked highest. Twenty-six RCTs (N = 7044) provided data for agoraphobia. The strongest reductions in agoraphobia symptoms were found for citalopram, reboxetine, escitalopram, clomipramine and diazepam, compared to placebo. For the pooled intervention classes, we examined the two primary outcomes (response and dropout). The classes of medication were: SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs. For the response outcome, all classes of medications examined were more effective than placebo. TCAs as a class ranked as the most effective, followed by BDZs and MAOIs. SSRIs as a class ranked fifth on average, while SNRIs were ranked lowest. When we compared classes of medication with each other for the response outcome, we found no difference between classes. Comparisons between MAOIs and TCAs and between BDZs and TCAs also suggested no differences between these medications, but the results were imprecise. For the dropout outcome, BDZs were the only class associated with a lower dropout compared to placebo and were ranked first in terms of tolerability. The other classes did not show any difference in dropouts compared to placebo. In terms of ranking, TCAs are on average second to BDZs, followed by SNRIs, then by SSRIs and lastly by MAOIs. BDZs were associated with lower dropout rates compared to SSRIs, SNRIs and TCAs. The quality of the studies comparing antidepressants with placebo was moderate, while the quality of the studies comparing BDZs with placebo and antidepressants was low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In terms of efficacy, SSRIs, SNRIs (venlafaxine), TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs may be effective, with little difference between classes. However, it is important to note that the reliability of these findings may be limited due to the overall low quality of the studies, with all having unclear or high risk of bias across multiple domains. Within classes, some differences emerged. For example, amongst the SSRIs paroxetine and fluoxetine seem to have stronger evidence of efficacy than sertraline. Benzodiazepines appear to have a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability (incidence of dropouts) over other classes.

Agoraphobia and panic attacks complicated by primary aldosteronism improved by treatment with eplerenone: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is an adrenal gland disease, that induces increased secretion of the mineralocorticoid, aldosterone, resulting in symptoms such as hypertension. This study reports a patient with agoraphobia and panic attacks, associated with PA. This patient's psychiatric symptoms improved after treatment with eplerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 40-year-old female with agoraphobia, which refers to the irrational fear of situations that may cause anxiety, and panic attacks characterized by profuse sweating, palpitations, and generalized weakness. She was diagnosed with hypertension from PA. Subsequently, she received treatment with eplerenone, which improved her agoraphobia and panic attacks. CONCLUSIONS: There have been no previous reports on PA associated with agoraphobia and panic attacks that improved with pharmacotherapy. Patients with agoraphobia and panic attacks should be evaluated for PA. In patients with PA, pharmacotherapy with eplerenone should be considered.

Pharmacological approaches to the management of panic disorder in older patients: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations for treating panic disorder (PD) in older patients are scarce. The authors have systematically reviewed whether several recommended medications are superior to others and their optimal doses in this age group. METHODS: A database search of studies involving patients with PD with/without agoraphobia aged ≥ 60 years was carried out using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Clinical Trials.gov, from their inception dates to 1 March 2023. Only four (published from 2002 to 2010) of the 1292 records screened were included. A risk of bias assessment was provided. This systematic review was performed using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS: Two studies were randomized clinical trials, whereas two were open-label, including paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline; three studies reported short-term evaluations, whereas one study included a 26-week follow-up. Medications provided benefits, with good tolerability. Preliminary results suggested greater benefits of paroxetine in reducing panic attacks vs. cognitive - behavioral therapy, and an earlier decrease in PAs with escitalopram vs. citalopram. Risk of bias was considerable. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of PD in older patients has received no attention. Findings are scant, dated, and affected by methodological flaws; thus, they do not provide significant advances.

[Exposure therapy for panic disorder and agoraphobia in the context of existing antidepressive medication]. / Expositionstherapie bei Panikstörung und Agoraphobie im Kontext bestehender antidepressiver Medikation.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy with antidepressants are both a highly effective treatment for agoraphobia and/or panic disorder; however, a combination of CBT and antidepressants is under debate due to potentially unfavorable interference effects. The associations of existing antidepressant medication with panic and agoraphobia symptom burden and their change in the context of a structured 5­week day hospital and exposure-focused treatment in a naturalistic setting were investigated. METHODS: Out of a total of n = 488 patients medication use during treatment was retrospectively determined for n = 380: n = 100 (26.3%) were taking antidepressants of different drug classes. Calculations were performed using multiple linear regression analysis, t­tests, response analyses, and χ2-tests. RESULTS: Patients with existing antidepressant medication more often met the criteria for comorbid depressive disorder (p < 0.001). The measure of symptom change and treatment response rates did not differ between patients with and without antidepressants with respect to anxiety symptoms. DISCUSSION: In the context studied, patients with and without existing antidepressant medication benefited equally from CBT with respect to anxiety symptoms.

Effects of the immunoglobulin/histamine complex on panic disorder concurrent with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Panic disorder and panic attacks are two of the most common problems in psychiatry. A psychoimmunological correlation between allergic diseases and panic disorder has been strongly suggested. Histamine H1 receptor antagonists have been suggested as alternative drugs for the treatment of panic disorder. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and panic disorder improved simultaneously with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. Panic disorder has also been treated with the antihistamine chlorpheniramine. The immunoglobulin/histamine complex is a histamine-fixed immunoglobulin preparation that was reported to be effective in treating CSU. This case report describes the successful treatment of a patient with concomitant panic disorder and CSU for 23 years using immunoglobulin/histamine complex therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes a 52-year-old female Korean patient who suffered from CSU with panic disorder for 23 years. Basic allergy tests (blood tests and skin prick tests) were conducted before and after treatment for the evaluation of allergic conditions. A multiple allergosorbent test (MAST) for the detection of allergen-specific IgE levels was also performed. The clinical severity of CSU was evaluated using the urticaria severity score system. Diagnostic interviews systematically assessed the diagnostic criteria outlined by the DSM-V, and the patient was evaluated before, during and after treatment using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-2) for depression, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for anxiety and the Beck Hopelessness Score (BHS) for hopelessness. The patient received 2 ml of Histobulin™ (12 mg human immunoglobulin/0.15 µg histamine complex) once a week by subcutaneous injection for the treatment of CSU. Initial improvement of CSU was achieved after the third injection. After the twenty-seventh injection of Histobulin™, she showed no symptoms or signs and ceased allergic medication use. With the remission of CSU, allergic rhinitis was also completely resolved. The frequency of the common cold was significantly decreased during and after treatment. The medication frequency and development of clinical manifestations of panic disorder changed in parallel with the clinical severity of CSU. Moreover, the patient exhibited no clinical manifestations and ceased medication for panic disorder and sleeping pills for insomnia simultaneously with the remission of CSU. In the psychological evaluation, the BDI, STAI and BHS scores improved accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: The immunoglobulin/histamine complex was effective in treating CSU and concomitant panic disorder in this patient and could be effective in treating some types of panic disorder. Considering the mechanisms of action of histamine and the immunoglobulin/histamine complex together with the patient's clinical progress, histamine seemed to be related to panic disorder in this case. The concept of histamine-mediated syndromes, including allergies and psychiatric disorders, shows that a wider disease identity may be needed. Further studies on the immunopathogenesis of panic disorder and the mechanisms of action of the immunoglobulin/histamine complex are necessary.

The psychological and physiological effects of integrated cognitive-behavioral and biofeedback therapy on panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and biofeedback therapy are commonly regarded as effective treatment modalities for panic disorder. The aim of this study was to establish a Taiwanese version of an integrated cognitive-behavioral and biofeedback therapy (ICB) and examine its effects on panic disorder using psychological and physiological indicators. METHODS: Thirty patients with panic disorder were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned to either the ICB group (n = 15) or the treatment as usual (TAU) group (n = 15). The intervention consisted of six sessions, conducted once a week. Psychological indicators were measured at baseline (prior to intervention), week 3, and week 6, while physiological indicators were measured at baseline and week 6. The psychological indicators included five scales, with the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) being the primary measure. The physiological indicators included respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and skin conductance, which respectively represent parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. RESULTS: Considering all participants, PDSS scores significantly decreased over time, but the difference between the ICB and TAU groups did not reach statistical significance. Among the physiological indicators, resting-state RSA and RSA under relaxation showed significant between-group differences over time, with the ICB group demonstrating a more pronounced improvement in RSA. CONCLUSION: In the context of existing pharmacological treatments, the benefits of ICB for panic disorder may not be observable through psychological indicators. However, it can lead to enhancement of parasympathetic activity as evidenced by the physiological indicators.

Alprazolam: Good for Some, Not Good for All!

BACKGROUND: Although alprazolam is approved only for use in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, it is used for numerous other conditions, not only by psychiatrists but also by medical professionals in general. This commentary critically analyzes the use of alprazolam. METHODS: A narrative review approach was adopted, using relevant articles and textbooks, to compile pertinent literature for the aforementioned topic. RESULTS: Among all its adverse reactions, the most bothersome concern about the use of alprazolam is its potential for abuse and dependence. This can be attributed to certain unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this benzodiazepine. Also, the withdrawal triggered by use of alprazolam is challenging to treat. Alternate pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for use in anxiety and insomnia are available, which might be safer than alprazolam. Also, policy changes can serve as an answer to curb alprazolam abuse to some extent. Alprazolam might still be a good choice for individuals who do not have a history of abuse of other substances, with adequate psychoeducation and close monitoring of their usage pattern. CONCLUSION: There is a need to reconsider the need for long-term use of benzodiazepines in general, and alprazolam in particular. However, they still might be an appropriate choice in individuals where abuse and dependence are less likely.

Can the aberrant occipital-cerebellum network be a predictor of treatment in panic disorder?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to detect altered brain activation pattern of patients with panic disorder (PD) and its changes after treatment. The possibilities of diagnosis and prediction of treatment response based on the aberrant brain activity were tested. METHODS: Fifty-four PD patients and 54 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Clinical assessment and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted. Then, patients received a 4-week paroxetine treatment and underwent a second clinical assessment and scan. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was measured. Support vector machine (SVM) and support vector regression (SVR) analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Lower fALFF values in the right calcarine/lingual gyrus and left lingual gyrus/cerebellum IV/V, whereas higher fALFF values in right cerebellum Crus II were observed in patients related to HCs at baseline. After treatment, patients with PD exhibited significant clinical improvement, and the abnormal lower fALFF values in the right lingual gyrus exhibited a great increase. The abnormal fALFF at pretreatment can distinguish patients from HCs with 80 % accuracy and predict treatment response which was reflected in the significant correlation between the predicted and actual treatment responses. LIMITATIONS: The impacts of ethnic, cultural, and other regional differences on PD were not considered for it was a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: The occipital-cerebellum network played an important role in the pathophysiology of PD and should be a part of the fear network. The abnormal fALFF values in patients with PD at pretreatment could serve as biomarkers of PD and predict the early treatment response of paroxetine.

Latency to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor vs benzodiazepine treatment in patients with panic disorder: a naturalistic study.

BACKGROUND: Panic disorder (PD) is a prevalent and impairing anxiety disorder with previous reports suggesting that the longer the condition remains untreated, the greater the likelihood of nonresponse. However, patients with PD may wait for years before receiving a guideline-recommended pharmacological treatment. The widespread prescription of benzodiazepines (BDZ) for managing anxiety symptoms and disorders might delay the administration of pharmacotherapy according to guidelines (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs). The present study aimed to determine the mean duration of untreated illness (DUI) in a sample of PD patients, to quantify and compare DUI-SSRI to DUI-BDZ, and to compare findings with those from previous investigations. METHODS: Three hundred and fourteen patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition diagnosis of PD were recruited from an Italian outpatient psychotherapy unit, and epidemiological and clinical variables were retrieved from medical records. Descriptive statistical analyses were undertaken for sociodemographic and clinical variables, Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test was applied to compare the distribution of DUI-SSRI vs DUI-BDZ, and Welch's t test was performed to compare findings with those from previous studies. RESULTS: The mean DUI-SSRI of the total sample was 64.25 ± 112.74 months, while the mean DUI-BDZ was significantly shorter (35.09 ± 78.62 months; P < 0.0001). A significantly longer DUI-SSRI, compared to findings from previous studies, was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present results confirm a substantial delay in implementing adequate pharmacological treatments in patients with PD, and highlight the discrepancy between recommendations from international treatment guidelines and common clinical practice in relation to BDZ prescription.

Integrated genome-wide methylation and expression analyses provide predictors of diagnosis and early response to antidepressant in panic disorder.

BACKGROUND: We investigated differentially methylated and expressed genes between panic disorder (PD) and healthy controls (HCs) to determine whether DNA methylation and expression level of candidate genes can be used as biomarkers for diagnosis and early response. METHODS: Illumina infiniun Methylation EPIC (850 k) Beadchip for genome-wide methylation screening and mRNA sequencing was conducted in a discovery set (30 patients with PD and 30 matched HCs). The candidate gene loci methylation and expression were verified in an independent validation sample (101 PD patients and 107 HCs). RESULTS: In the discovery set, there were 3613 differentially methylated cytosine phosphate guanosine sites and these differential methylation positions were located within 1938 unique genes, including 1758 hypermethylated genes, 150 hypomethylated genes, and the coexistence of hypermethylation and hypomethylation sites were found in 30 genes. There were 1111 differential transcripts in PD compared to normal controls (850 down-regulated and 261 up-regulated). Further, 212 differentially expressed genes were screened (40 up-regulated and 172 down-regulated). In the validation set, compared with HCs, there was no significant difference in DNA methylation level of Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) gene loci (cg07123846). The expression level of CBL gene in PD patients was lower (vs. HCs). After four weeks' treatment, the baseline expression level of CBL gene in the responders was higher than nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was limited. We only chose CBL as a candidate gene. Follow-up periods were short. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA expression between PD patients and HCs. The changes in expression level of CBL gene may be an important molecular marker for PD diagnosis and early response.

Prediction of prognosis in patients with panic disorder using pre-treatment brain white matter features.

BACKGROUND: The early identification of patients with panic disorder (PD) with a poor prognosis is important for improving treatment outcomes; however, it is challenging due to a lack of objective biomarkers. We investigated the reliability of characterizing structural white matter (WM) connectivity and its ability to predict PD prognosis after pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A total of 138 patients (59 men) with PD and 153 healthy controls (HCs; 73 men) participated in this study. PD symptom severity was measured using the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) at baseline and follow-up periods of 8 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) was utilized to identify prognosis-related WM regions on diffusion imaging features. RESULTS: Lasso identified seven prognosis-related WM regions: the bilateral posterior corona radiata, bilateral posterior limb of the internal capsule, the left retrolenticular part of the internal capsule, the left sagittal stratum, and the right fornix/stria terminalis. Some of these regions showed lower mean fractional anisotropy (FA) values in patients with PD than in HCs. The predicted PDSS scores using FA from these regions consistently correlated with the actual prognosis in all periods. LIMITATIONS: This study had limited ability to evaluate individual longitudinal changes in detail owing to the data acquisition time and brain atlas resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the possibility of using structural WM connectivity as a biomarker for the clinical characterization of PD. Our findings will expand our understanding of the neurobiology of PD and improve biomarker-based prognosis prediction in clinical practice.

Cannabidiol enhancement of exposure therapy in treatment refractory patients with social anxiety disorder and panic disorder with agoraphobia: A randomised controlled trial.

Preclinical research suggests that enhancing CB1 receptor agonism may improve fear extinction. In order to translate this knowledge into a clinical application we examined whether cannabidiol (CBD), a hydrolysis inhibitor of the endogenous CB1 receptor agonist anandamide (AEA), would enhance the effects of exposure therapy in treatment refractory patients with anxiety disorders. Patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia or social anxiety disorder were recruited for a double-blind parallel randomised controlled trial at three mental health care centres in the Netherlands. Eight therapist-assisted exposure in vivo sessions (weekly, outpatient) were augmented with 300 mg oral CBD (n = 39) or placebo (n = 41). The Fear Questionnaire (FQ) was assessed at baseline, mid- and post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Primary analyses were on an intent-to-treat basis. No differences were found in treatment outcome over time between CBD and placebo on FQ scores, neither across (ß = 0.32, 95% CI [-0.60; 1.25]) nor within diagnosis groups (ß = -0.11, 95% CI [-1.62; 1.40]). In contrast to our hypotheses, CBD augmentation did not enhance early treatment response, within-session fear extinction or extinction learning. Incidence of adverse effects was equal in the CBD (n = 4, 10.3%) and placebo condition (n = 6, 15.4%). In this first clinical trial examining CBD as an adjunctive therapy in anxiety disorders, CBD did not improve treatment outcome. Future clinical trials may investigate different dosage regimens.

Generaliseerunud ärevushäire ja paanikahäire (agorafoobiaga või ilma) käsitlus perearstiabis / Management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in family practice

The update of the treatment manual "Management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in family medicine" was initiated because more than five years had passed since the publication of the original manual in 2014. The procedure for updating treatment manuals is written in the "Estonian manual for the preparation of treatment manuals" (2020). At the first meeting, the working group of the treatment guideline reviewed the questions raised during the preparation of the original guideline and found that some clinical questions concerning the pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder may have added evidence over time, which may change the originally given recommendation. They also wanted to review the recommendations regarding healthcare management given in the original guide. Based on the audit of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (1) published in 2018, it was revealed that the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of anxiety disorders varies in Estonia. One of the observations was the incomplete completion of treatment documentation, which made it difficult to assess and understand the justification of various actions and the doctor's thinking in the treatment of a patient with an anxiety disorder. The audit showed that most of the patients were prescribed treatment at the initial visit: a third were recommended psychotherapy, a third were prescribed antidepressant treatment, and a third were treated with a benzodiazepine. However, recommendations on self-help techniques are mostly not shared. The auditors recommended developing evidence-based material on self-help techniques that can be given to the patient (with him). The audit also noted that sufficient opportunities must be ensured to refer patients to psychotherapy. Mental health nurses are needed, who would help monitor and support patients. In order to ensure the best treatment for the patient, it is important that the family doctor can easily consult with a psychiatrist during the treatment process. The purpose of updating the treatment manual was to ensure contemporary evidence-based treatment of patients with anxiety disorders in family medicine care in Estonia. When updating the guide, the focus was on the (re)opened questions of the working group and the bottlenecks in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders revealed by the audit.

Ravijuhendi "Generaliseerunud ärevushäire ja paanikahäire (agorafoobiaga või ilma) käsitlus perearstiabis" ajakohastamine algatati, kuna algse juhendi ilmu- misest 2014. aastal oli möödunud üle viie aasta. Ravijuhendite uuendamise kord on kirjas "Eesti ravijuhendite koostamise käsiraamatus" (2020). Ravijuhendi töörühm vaatas esimesel koosolekul läbi algse juhendi koostamisel esitatud küsi- mused ja leidis, et mõningate generaliseerunud ärevushäire farmakoloogilist ravi puudutavate kliiniliste küsimuste kohta võib aja jooksul olla lisandunud tõen- dusmaterjali, mis võib algselt antud soovitust muuta. Samuti sooviti üle vaadata algses juhendis antud tervishoiukorraldust puudutavad soovitused. 2018. aastal ilmunud Eesti Haigekassa auditi (1) põhjal selgus, et ärevushäirete diagnoosimine, ravi ja jälgimine Eestis varieerub. Üks tähelepanekuid oli puudu- lik ravidokumentatsiooni täitmine, mistõttu oli raske hinnata ja aru saada eri tege- vuste põhjendatusest ja arsti mõttekäigust ärevushäirega patsiendi käsitluses. Au- dit näitas, et esmasel visiidil määrati enamikule patsientidest ravi: kolmandikule soovitati psühhoteraapiat, kolmandikule määrati antidepressantravi ja kolmandik sai raviks bensodiasepiini. Soovitusi eneseabivõtete kohta enamasti aga ei jaga- tud. Auditeerijad soovitasid välja töötada tõenduspõhise materjali eneseabivõte- te kohta, mille saab patsiendile (kaasa) anda. Veel märgiti auditis, et patsientide psühhoteraapiale suunamiseks tuleb tagada piisavad võimalused. Juurde on vaja vaimse tervise õdesid, kes aitaksid patsiente jälgida ja toetaksid neid. Patsiendile parima ravi tagamiseks on oluline, et raviprotsessis saaks perearst vajadusel hõlp- sasti psühhiaatriga konsulteerida. Ravijuhendi ajakohastamise eesmärk oli tagada ärevushäirega patsientide nüü- disaegne tõenduspõhine käsitlus perearstiabis Eestis. Juhendi ajakohastamisel keskenduti töörühma (taas)avatud küsimustele ja auditist selgunud ärevushäirega patsiendi käsitluse kitsaskohtadele.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the placebo effect in panic disorder: Implications for research and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to measure the degree of placebo response in panic disorder. DATA SOURCES: We searched major databases up to 31 January 2021, for randomized pharmacotherapy trials published in English. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 43 studies met inclusion criteria to be in the analysis (with 174 separate outcome measurements). DATA EXTRACTION: Changes in outcome measures from baseline in the placebo group were used to estimate modified Cohen's d effect size. RESULTS: A total of 43 trials (2392 subjects, 174 outcomes using 27 rating scales) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall placebo effect size was 0.57 (95% confidence interval = [0.50, 0.64]), heterogeneity (I2: 96.3%). Higher placebo effect size was observed among clinician-rated scales compared to patient reports (0.75 vs 0.35) and among general symptom and anxiety scales compared to panic symptoms and depression scales (0.92 and 0.64 vs 0.56 and 0.54, respectively). There was an upward trend in effect size over the publication period (r = 0.02, p = 0.002) that was only significant among clinician-rated scales (r = 0.02, p = 0.011). There was no significant publication bias, Egger's test (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: We observed a substantial placebo effect size in panic disorder. This effect was more prominent for some aspects of panic disorder psychopathology than for others and was correlated with the source of the assessment and publication year. This finding has implications both for research design, to address the heterogeneity and diversity in placebo responses, and for clinical practice to ensure optimal quality of care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, CRD42019125979.

Drug treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To identify drug classes and individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with high rates of remission and low risk of adverse events in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 17 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials that included adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of panic disorder, compared drugs used to treat the panic disorder, and measured the outcomes of interest, including remissions, dropouts, and adverse events. METHODS: Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Direct meta-analyses were performed using random effects models. A two stage network meta-analysis with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of drug classes and individual SSRIs. RESULTS: 87 studies including a total of 12 800 participants and 12 drug classes were eligible for inclusion. Almost all the studies (86/87) had some concern or were at high risk of bias. Network meta-analysis of remission with consistent results indicated that tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, SSRIs, and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were associated with significantly higher remission rates than placebo, with risk ratios of 1.39 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.54), 1.47 (1.36 to 1.60), 1.30 (1.00 to 1.69), 1.38 (1.26 to 1.50), and 1.27 (1.12 to 1.45), respectively. SUCRAs identified benzodiazepines (84.5%, mean rank=2.4), tricyclic antidepressants (68.7%, 3.8), and SSRIs (66.4%, 4.0) as the top three best treatments for remission. However, tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and SSRIs were also significantly associated with increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo, with risk ratios of 1.79 (1.47 to 2.19), 1.76 (1.50 to 2.06), and 1.19 (1.01 to 1.41), respectively. Consistency assumption of adverse events was upheld but could still be present on removal of studies with high percentages of women participants and those with agoraphobia. A SUCRA cluster ranking plot considering both remission and adverse events among all drug classes indicated that SSRIs were associated with high remission and low risk of adverse events. Among individual SSRIs, sertraline and escitalopram provided high remission with an acceptable risk of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that SSRIs provide high rates of remission with low risk of adverse events for the treatment of panic disorder. Among SSRIs, sertraline and escitalopram were associated with high remission and low risk of adverse events. The findings were, however, based on studies of moderate to very low certainty levels of evidence, mostly as a result of within study bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of the findings reported. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020180638.

Effects of caffeine on anxiety and panic attacks in patients with panic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Caffeine has been purported to have anxiogenic and panicogenic properties, specifically salient in patients with panic disorder (PD). However, compilations of the magnitude of the effect of caffeine on anxiety and panic attacks are lacking and potential dose-response relationships have not been examined. OBJECTIVES: In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to examine the acute effects of placebo-controlled caffeine challenge on occurrence of panic attacks and subjective anxiety in patients with PD and healthy controls (HC), including dose-response relationships. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in six databases. We included blinded placebo-controlled studies of acute caffeine challenge on panic attacks and/or subjective anxiety in adult patients with PD. RESULTS: Of the 1893 identified articles, ten met our inclusion criteria. The 9 studies investigating panic attacks included 237 patients, of which 51.1% had a panic attack following caffeine, but none after placebo. Six of these studies compared 128 patients with 115 healthy controls (HC), finding that patients (53.9%) were more vulnerable than HC (1.7%) for panic attacks following caffeine (log RR: 3.47; 95% CI 2.06-4.87). Six studies investigated subjective anxiety in 121 patients and 111 HC following caffeine, with an overall effect indicating increased sensitivity to the anxiogenic effects of caffeine in the patient group (Hedges' g = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.09-1.96]). The restricted range of caffeine employed [400-750 mg] and few studies (3) not using 480 mg prevented any meaningful analysis of a dose-response relationship. LIMITATIONS: Of the ten studies included, only 2 reported anxiety data for the placebo condition, precluding a proper meta-analysis comparing anxiogenic effects of caffeine and placebo. The restricted dose range used prevented assessment of dose-response relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that caffeine at doses roughly equivalent to 5 cups of coffee induces panic attacks in a large proportion of PD patients and highly discriminates this population from healthy adults. Caffeine also increases anxiety in PD patients as well as among healthy adults at these doses although the exact relationship between caffeine-induced anxiety and panic attacks remains uncertain. The results suggest that caffeine targets important mechanisms related to the pathophysiology of PD. IMPLICATIONS: Future studies should employ a wider range of caffeine doses and investigate contributions of biological and psychological mechanisms underlying the anxiogenic and panicogenic effects of caffeine. In the clinic, patients with PD should be informed about the panicogenic and anxiogenic effects of caffeine, with the caveat that little is known regarding smaller doses than 480 mg. Registration. PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) registration number CRD42019120220.

Enhanced responsiveness to hypoxic panicogenic challenge in female rats in late diestrus is suppressed by short-term, low-dose fluoxetine: Involvement of the dorsal raphe nucleus and the dorsal periaqueductal gray.

BACKGROUND: Acute hypoxia, which is panicogenic in humans, also evokes panic-like behavior in male rats. Panic disorder is more common in women and susceptibility increases during the premenstrual phase of the cycle. AIMS: We here investigated for the first time the impact of hypoxia on the expression of panic-like escape behavior by female rats and its relationship with the estrous cycle. We also evaluated functional activation of the midbrain panic circuitry in response to this panicogenic stimulus and whether short-term, low-dose fluoxetine treatment inhibits the hyper-responsiveness of females in late diestrus. METHODS: Male and female Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to 7% O2. Females in late diestrus were also tested after short-term treatment with fluoxetine (1.75 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.). Brains were harvested and processed for c-Fos and tryptophan hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and dorsal raphe nucleus (DR). RESULTS: Acute hypoxia evoked escape in both sexes. Overall, females were more responsive than males and this is clearer in late diestrus phase. In both sexes, hypoxia induced functional activation (c-Fos expression) in non-serotonergic cells in the lateral wings of the DR and dorsomedial PAG, which was greater in late diestrus than proestrus (lowest behavioral response to hypoxia). Increased responding in late diestrus (behavioral and cellular levels) was prevented by 1.75, but not 10 mg/kg fluoxetine. DISCUSSION: The response of female rats to acute hypoxia models panic behavior in women. Low-dose fluoxetine administered in the premenstrual phase deserves further attention for management of panic disorders in women.